Define the record
Agree which system owns each field, what starts a transfer and how to recognise an existing customer. Separate a new enquiry from a new contact.
Keep the right customer information connected across your website, CRM and team. We map records, events and ownership before building the integration.
Scope, price, external costs and acceptance tests are agreed before implementation.
A defined transfer between named systems, with clear field ownership and a record your team can act on. The MOMA LIV case shows website, Bitrix24, Meta and partner-company work; each new connection still needs its own access and feasibility check.
For a business where people copy the same details between tools, partner companies use different systems or a form notification never becomes a complete sales task.
Agree which system owns each field, what starts a transfer and how to recognise an existing customer. Separate a new enquiry from a new contact.
Implement the agreed route with authentication and permissions appropriate to the task. Handle missing or conflicting information explicitly.
Compare source and destination records, repeat the event and interrupt a provider connection. Confirm what the team receives and who recovers a failed transfer.

A property website, CRM, Meta channels and partner-company integrations working together in the sales process.
Related workA practical guide: How to define an automation before building itNo. Our work includes Bitrix24 and Kommo. Other systems are assessed against the required APIs, permissions and business process.
Duplicate behaviour is part of the scope. We define stable identifiers and matching rules and include repeated events in acceptance testing.
Yes, where access and data-sharing responsibilities are agreed. Partner integrations need clear boundaries for records, permissions and support.
Scope, price, external costs and acceptance tests are agreed before implementation.